Coming soon: Mortgage360 mobile app for iOS & Android — Client portal + Broker portal in your pocket.
Mortgage360
Mortgage360 vs Jungo

A mature mortgage CRM — for a different country's mortgage market

Jungo is a well-established mortgage CRM with a genuine mortgage data model, built on Salesforce for US loan officers. The mismatch for a Canadian brokerage is structural rather than a matter of quality: different regulator, different submission rail, different qualification math.

Request a demoSee the platform

Last reviewed . Built from Jungo's public documentation and pricing — not from a demo. Spotted something out of date? Tell us.

About Jungo

Jungo, in their words and ours

Jungo is a mortgage CRM built on Salesforce platform based in United States, primarily serving US loan officers and mortgage teams. Here's a fair read of what they do well and where the trade-offs are — so you can decide if Mortgage360 is a fit.

What Jungo does well

  • A real mortgage data model rather than a generic CRM with custom fields
  • Mature product with a long track record among US loan officers
  • Inherits Salesforce's reporting, automation and integration ecosystem
  • Strong marketing automation and referral-partner management
  • Well-developed post-close and retention campaigns for its market

Factual trade-offs

  • Built for US mortgage workflow — no Filogix Exchange submission
  • US qualification math rather than GDS/TDS and OSFI B-20 stress testing
  • No FINTRAC identity capture or Canadian statutory retention
  • Salesforce licensing sits underneath, affecting total cost
  • Canadian provincial calculations and licensing structures are out of scope
Why teams choose Mortgage360

Where Mortgage360 goes further

Canadian workflow, not adapted
Filogix Exchange submission, GDS/TDS and B-20 stress testing, and provincial land-transfer calculations built for this market rather than translated into it.
FINTRAC rather than US AML
Identity verification, statutory retention and audit trail matched to Canadian obligations and the way examinations here actually run.
No platform licence underneath
One subscription rather than a mortgage layer priced on top of a Salesforce licence you also maintain.
Provincial licensing built in
Licence classes and continuing-education tracking per province, which a US product has no reason to model.
Side-by-side

Capability comparison

Honest read. Cells reflect publicly available information about each platform's current capabilities. Send corrections to hello@mortgage360.ai.

Capability
Mortgage360
Built for Canada
Jungo
US loan officers and mortgage teams
Contact holds multiple mortgages over time
Renewal or refinance cycle campaigns
Co-applicants, guarantors, co-signers
Referral partner management
~
Filogix Exchange submission
GDS/TDS and OSFI B-20 stress test
Provincial land-transfer calculations
FINTRAC identity and retention
Power dialer
~
Commission split calculation
~
Provincial licence and CE tracking
Works without a Salesforce licence
Usable without an implementation partner
~
Built from Jungo's public documentation and pricing — not from a demo. Last reviewed August 21, 2026. We do not block competitor pages from indexing; this is a fair-comparison resource we publish in good faith.
Rows: 13

Choosing between Mortgage360 and Jungo

A real mortgage data model, built for a different country

Jungo is not a general-purpose CRM bent into shape. It is a genuine mortgage CRM with real mortgage concepts, built on Salesforce — and on that axis it is a more serious product than most of the generic alternatives.

The problem is jurisdiction. It is built for the United States: US lenders, US submission rails, US qualification math and US regulatory obligations. Those are not cosmetic differences, because the mortgage business differs at exactly the level a CRM models.

Canada has Filogix Exchange rather than the US submission ecosystem, FINTRAC rather than the US AML regime, provincial licensing under MBLAA and its equivalents rather than NMLS, and a renewal cycle that has no direct US counterpart — the single most valuable retention event in a Canadian broker's book.

The renewal cycle is the clearest example

Canadian mortgages come up for renewal every few years. That is the moment a broker either retains a client or loses them, and it is the organising event of a Canadian retention strategy.

A US-built CRM has no reason to model it, because the thirty-year fixed does not produce the same event. Everything downstream — maturity-date scanning, renewal campaigns, lifecycle automation — therefore has to be improvised in a system with no native concept of it.

Mortgage360 treats the maturity date as a first-class field that drives automation, because in this market that is the point.

What running it on Salesforce adds

Jungo inherits Salesforce's extensibility and its ecosystem, which is a real advantage if you are already invested there. It also inherits the licence underneath and the need for someone to own the configuration.

For a Canadian brokerage that combination is a hard sell — a US data model, a platform licence and a configuration burden, in exchange for a product whose core assumptions do not match the market you operate in.

Common questions

Is Mortgage360 a Jungo alternative?+

Yes, and the distinction is jurisdiction rather than sophistication. Jungo is a genuine mortgage CRM built for the United States. Mortgage360 is built for Canadian lenders, Filogix submission, FINTRAC and provincial licensing.

What does Jungo do well?+

It has a real mortgage data model rather than a general CRM adapted after the fact, and it inherits Salesforce's extensibility and ecosystem. On that axis it is more serious than most generic alternatives.

Why does the country matter so much?+

Because the differences sit at exactly the level a CRM models — Filogix Exchange rather than the US submission ecosystem, FINTRAC rather than the US AML regime, provincial licensing rather than NMLS, and a renewal cycle with no direct US equivalent.

What is the renewal cycle issue?+

Canadian mortgages renew every few years, and that is the moment a broker retains or loses a client. A US-built CRM has no reason to model it, so maturity-date scanning, renewal campaigns and lifecycle automation all have to be improvised.

Does Jungo support Filogix?+

Filogix is Canadian infrastructure and a US-built platform has little reason to integrate with it. Mortgage360 syncs both directions — 1,047 fields in under five seconds.

What about FINTRAC and provincial licensing?+

Identity verification is captured on the deal and retained against the client, so an examiner's request is answered from the system rather than reconstructed from email. Licensing status and continuing-education hours are tracked per agent. Confirm your own obligations with FINTRAC and your provincial regulator.

Do I need a Salesforce licence for Jungo?+

Jungo is built on Salesforce, so the platform sits underneath it, along with the need for someone to own the configuration. Mortgage360 has no platform licence beneath it.

Are commission splits handled the Canadian way?+

Yes — tiered and package-based structures with qualification periods, calculated against the funded deal, including across agents at brokerage level.

When might Jungo still make sense?+

If you operate in the United States, or across both markets with US volume dominant and an existing Salesforce estate. For a Canada-only brokerage the data model works against you.

Continue reading

Decide for yourself

See Mortgage360 next to Jungo

A 20-minute demo with your real-world data. No prep needed. No follow-up unless you want one.

Request a demoSee pricing