Buyer's guide · updated August 2026

Best mortgage CRM in Canada (2026)

Eight platforms Canadian agents and brokerages realistically choose between, scored against a published methodology. We are one of them, and we say so in every section where it matters.

See Mortgage360 How to choose

Disclosure: we are in this comparison

Mortgage360 publishes this page and ranks itself first under its own weighting. That is a real bias and you should treat it as one. What we can offer instead of false neutrality: the methodology below is published in full, competitor strengths are stated genuinely rather than as token concessions, and there are no affiliate links or paid placements anywhere on this page. Re-weight the criteria for your own situation and the order will change.

Methodology

How we scored

Six criteria, weighted by how often each one is the thing that actually costs a brokerage money. Every platform was assessed on publicly available information, published documentation and hands-on evaluation.

25%

Mortgage data model

Does a contact hold multiple mortgages over decades? Are renewal dates, co-applicants, guarantors and properties modelled as real entities rather than custom fields?

20%

Follow-up + retention

Does the system chase what you forget — stale leads, renewal windows, post-funding check-ins — or does it only store what you type in?

20%

Canadian workflow

Filogix Exchange submission, GDS/TDS and B-20 stress-test math, provincial calculations, lender product context.

15%

Compliance

FINTRAC identity capture, statutory retention, audit trail, and whether an examination is a report or a reconstruction.

10%

Brokerage operations

Commission splits, agent oversight, recruiting, training — the layer a principal broker is accountable for.

10%

Total cost to run

Licence cost plus the dialer, the marketing tool and the implementation work you still have to buy elsewhere.

The platforms, ranked

Mortgage360

Our product

Mortgage CRM + origination platform

Best for: Agents and brokerages that want the CRM, dialer, compliance and commissions in one system

Strengths

Contacts are people and deals are mortgages, so one client can hold several mortgages across thirty years
Renewal dates are first-class and drive an automatic 120-day campaign
Power dialer is built in rather than integrated, so call logging is automatic
FINTRAC identity, retention and audit trail live on the deal
One platform covers solo agent through to multi-brokerage network

Trade-offs

Newer than the incumbents, with a smaller installed base in Canada
Payroll and the agent website builder are on the roadmap rather than shipped
If you only want application intake and nothing else, it is more platform than you need

See the product

Velocity (Newton Connectivity)

Broker platform with lender connectivity

Best for: Brokers who prioritise lender connectivity and submission throughput above all else

Strengths

Strong lender connectivity and submission workflow — its core competence
Well established with a substantial Canadian broker base
Backing and support structure of a large industry player
Familiar to many agents already, which lowers training cost

Trade-offs

Relationship management and long-horizon follow-up are lighter than a dedicated CRM
Brokerage operations such as commission calculation typically need another system
Less suited to agents whose main problem is retention rather than submission

Full side-by-side

Scarlett Network

Canadian mortgage broker CRM

Best for: Brokerages already inside the Scarlett ecosystem

Strengths

Purpose-built for the Canadian broker channel rather than adapted from a US product
Established presence with networks and larger brokerages
Covers CRM and workflow in one place
Understands Canadian mortgage structures natively

Trade-offs

Adoption is often driven by network relationships rather than individual choice
Individual agents have less say in configuration than at a self-serve platform
Calling and marketing generally still require separate tools

Full side-by-side

Finmo

Application-first workflow platform

Best for: Teams whose bottleneck is application intake and document collection

Strengths

Excellent borrower-facing application experience — genuinely one of the best in Canada
Document collection and classification are a real strength
Clean, modern interface that clients complete without hand-holding
Fast to adopt with little training

Trade-offs

Built around the application rather than the thirty-year client relationship
Renewal and long-cycle retention work generally falls back to the agent
Brokerage compliance and commission layers are thinner

Full side-by-side

Filogix BOSS (Finastra)

Broker workflow from the Filogix stack

Best for: Brokerages that want to stay entirely inside the Filogix ecosystem

Strengths

Sits directly alongside Filogix Exchange, the submission rail most of the channel already uses
Deep incumbency and lender familiarity across Canada
Backed by a large enterprise software vendor
Least friction if Filogix is already the centre of your process

Trade-offs

Interface and release cadence reflect enterprise software rather than modern SaaS
CRM and marketing capabilities are secondary to the submission workflow
Less flexible for agents who want to run their own retention programme

Full side-by-side

BluMortgage

Canadian broker CRM built on HubSpot

Best for: Brokerages already committed to HubSpot as a company standard

Strengths

Inherits HubSpot's mature marketing automation and reporting
Large ecosystem of integrations through the HubSpot marketplace
Familiar to anyone who has used HubSpot elsewhere
Strong email and campaign tooling out of the box

Trade-offs

You are ultimately running a sales CRM with a mortgage layer on top
HubSpot licensing sits underneath, so total cost can climb with contacts
Mortgage-specific compliance depends on how the layer is configured

Full side-by-side

Doorr

Canadian broker workflow tool

Best for: Smaller shops wanting something lightweight and quick to start

Strengths

Straightforward and quick to get running
Built for the Canadian broker channel
Lower complexity than full platforms, which suits small teams
Reasonable entry point for agents leaving spreadsheets

Trade-offs

Less depth in brokerage operations and compliance oversight
Fewer options as a brokerage scales past a handful of agents
Calling and marketing typically need additional subscriptions

Full side-by-side

Salesforce / HubSpot (generic CRM)

General-purpose sales CRM

Best for: Organisations with in-house development capacity and unusual requirements

Strengths

Effectively unlimited customisation if you have the resources to build it
Best-in-class reporting, automation and integration ecosystems
Enterprise-grade platform stability and support
Sensible if the mortgage business sits inside a larger financial group

Trade-offs

The mortgage layer is yours to build and maintain as regulations change
No Filogix submission, FINTRAC record or renewal model out of the box
Implementation partners and ongoing development are a material ongoing cost

Full side-by-side

Capability by capability

“Partial” usually means the capability exists but requires configuration, an add-on, or a third-party tool. It is not a euphemism for absent.

Capability

Mortgage360

This site

Velocity

Newton

Scarlett

Scarlett Network

Finmo

Application-first

Filogix BOSS

Finastra

BluMortgage

On HubSpot

Doorr

Lightweight

Generic CRM

Salesforce etc.

One contact holds multiple mortgages over time

Renewal date as a first-class, actionable field

Co-applicants, guarantors and co-signers modelled

Filogix Exchange submission

GDS/TDS and B-20 stress-test math

Provincial land-transfer calculations

Power dialer built in

Others typically integrate a third-party dialer at additional cost.

Social media management

Commission calculation

FINTRAC identity records on the deal

Statutory retention handled by system

Immutable audit log

Assessed August 2026 from public documentation, vendor materials and hands-on evaluation. Platforms ship changes continuously — if something here is wrong or has changed, tell us and we will correct it, including where the correction favours a competitor.

Questions buyers actually ask

What is the best mortgage CRM in Canada?

There is no single answer, because the right choice depends on what is actually broken. If your bottleneck is application intake, Finmo is excellent at that. If it is lender connectivity, Velocity is built around it. If it is retention, compliance and running a brokerage on one system, that is where Mortgage360 is strongest. We rank Mortgage360 first on our own weighting — and we disclose that we are a vendor in this list, so weigh it accordingly and test the criteria against your own situation.

Is a mortgage CRM different from a loan origination system?

Yes, though the line has blurred. A CRM manages the relationship — leads, follow-up, renewals, referrals. An origination system manages the file — application, documents, conditions, submission. Some platforms do one well and the other adequately. The practical question is which of the two is currently costing you deals.

Can I use Salesforce or HubSpot instead?

You can, and some brokerages do successfully. The trade-off is that the mortgage layer — the renewal model, co-applicant structure, FINTRAC record and Filogix hand-off — is yours to build and then maintain as rules change. That is reasonable with a developer on staff and expensive without one.

How often is this comparison updated?

Quarterly, and whenever a platform on the list ships something material. This page was last reviewed in August 2026. If you believe something here is out of date or wrong, tell us and we will correct it — including where the correction favours a competitor.

Do you get paid for these rankings?

No. There are no affiliate arrangements, sponsored placements or paid inclusions on this page. We are a vendor ranking a category we compete in, which is a real bias, and the methodology is published above so you can apply your own weighting.

What should I actually test on a demo?

Ask to see a client who has held three mortgages over fifteen years. Ask what happens 120 days before a renewal without anyone remembering. Ask to see the FINTRAC record for a funded deal. Ask what the dialer costs. Those four questions separate the platforms faster than any feature list.

Ready when you are

Test the four questions on us first

Three mortgages on one client, the 120-day renewal, the FINTRAC record, the dialer cost. Thirty minutes.

Book a demo See pricing